Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:33

Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Obsidian Reiterates $80 ‘Outer Worlds 2’ Price Is On Xbox, Not Them - Forbes
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
What thing happened to you as a child that you haven’t let go of to this day?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
NBA Draft winners, losers — plus a separate category - Chicago Sun-Times
Just in the last 5 years:
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Stephen A. Smith Responds to Viral Solitaire Photo from NBA Finals Game 4 - Bleacher Report
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
What’s next?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Blue Origin boss: Government should forget launch and focus on “exotic” missions - Ars Technica
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Let’s just make it real clear: